Pink Feldspar: that time we already had a worldwide free energy grid

Someone is bugging me to get busy finishing this post I started days ago...

I mean, if I can game like this, I can write blog posts like this.

Lefty isn't at all happy about being commandeered into gaming.

This super cracked me up and now I'm getting serious deja vue with it. Has this trend happened before and it slipped my mind, or is this an old set of photos? It seems really familiar.

I'm going to be discussing these videos.

Questions and concerns about the last post's video link- (the top vid up there)

How did astrolabes cross over from flat earth to global earth? Does that still work?
If our world is all about being an energy hypertorus and what we experience is a variety of vibrations and stuff, how is the argument for flat vs global even still valid? Neither one is a satisfactory visual to me.

Cool takeaways from that video-

If that is the truth about the architecture, that the entire world already had free energy and it was destroyed to capture and then entrap humanity into a debtor slave system, then we have a way more interesting history than what I was taught in school, and we need to rise up in fury over that being so forcefully taken away from us.
If that is the truth about orphanages and the social engineering that created the need for them and then the reassigning of identities, then all our lineages are probably extremely corrupted and genealogists need to rise up in fury.
That map in the moon was awesome. I already knew about being able to see stars through the moon, but the U.N. flat earth map being mirrored on the moon was weirdly exciting.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A couple of days and more vids later, I'm having more thoughts, and I think I can summarize this into a cohesive think piece. I'm about to include stuff from other videos in this think trail, which I'll share below near the bottom of the post.

🌞

There seem to be at least three historical versions going on, between all these vids, of what actually happened to humans and how our belief and education systems have been used since then to keep us blind and stupid.

All three versions seem to agree on parasitic invasion, whether insect, artificial intelligence, or other humans or human-type beings.

All three versions agree that our earth was far more technologically advanced in our past compared to what we are capable of now.

All three versions recognize that 'ancient' architecture was part of a world-wide energy grid system.

All three versions agree that our world history has been falsified, changed, and rewritten in very exaggerated ways to cover up what really happened.

All three versions agree that our world was attacked and destroyed all at once and billions of people vanished, although there is very little speculation where they went or what happened. Obviously we'd find evidence if a couple billion people had just suddenly died all over the world. (That last sentence just deja vued me into the movie Edge of Tomorrow and the STNG episode Cause and Effect.)

Overall, the research in all three versions is extensive and well thought out.

🌘

Discrepancies show up when they start discussing dates, perpetrators, intentions, and who the 'good guys' were in our historical records.

Some of the discrepancies are assumptions without evidence or logic behind conclusive statements, per their differing viewpoints of what was really going on.

One of the discrepancies is over our own ancestors being the architects vs outsiders being the architects, with a hint in at least one version that outsiders either are our ancestors or mixed with our ancestors, and from there further hinted at species subjugation. There is a very real chicken/egg debate inherent in this, which I'm not sure any of the researches quite noticed they were setting up.

One version might include other information or research that others don't, which lends a different quality to conclusive outcomes.

✨

My own interjections immediately beg the question of whether the ancient architects were the good guys or the parasites, and each different point of view wildly changes the historical perspective, as such-

If the architects came from outside our world ecosystem, one must wonder why the energy grid was set up in the first place, and who it was set up for. That alone is invasive, even if well intended.
If the architects originated from inside our world ecosystem and set the entire world up on a free energy system, who in their right minds would want to destroy it.
If the parasites came from outside to an energy grid set up by architects apart from them, one natural conclusion is that invasion destroys in order to subjugate,
OR if parasites came from outside and were themselves the architects, and this is where all the researchers missed this completely, they set up the energy grid in order to capture and the destruction was a well coordinated offensive by the original inhabitants to dismantle the parasites' power structure, which backfired horribly into a new slave grid replacing it wherein we are all monitored and controlled.

That is what it boils down to for me, one energy grid replaced another. WHY? It's obviously about control.

Short version-

Once upon a time we had a beautiful world and awesome tech and very high level science that far outstrips our 'modern' science, and the earth was peaceful. Then one day a world invasion flipped us upside down, the world energy grid was very thoroughly destroyed, a couple billion people went missing, and history ever since has been about convincing us that we crawled our way out of the mud into this modern age of rocket science that can't seem to replicate the ancient tech at all, and most of us are fairly destitute compared to the handful of elites running the world, and we keep getting sicker and uglier and poorer while the world gets meaner and tighter until most of us are so depressed and cynical that we sit around watching TV and drinking ourselves to sleep in between our life schedules and local calamities, more or less.

Very cool takeaways-

The moon having the U.N. flat earth map on it. O_O This clicks out to wikipedia.

Keep in mind that the map depiction may not necessarily mean anything substantive about anything corporeal on our earth as we know it, or in our past. I'm not advocating or debating flat or globe, just pointing out that Globalist are very obviously flying a 'flat earth' map flag.

The original colour the group chose in 1945 was a gray blue that differs from the current United Nations flag. The globe used in the original design was an azimuthal projection focused on the North Pole with the United States, the host nation of the conference, at the centre. The projection that was used cut off portions of the Southern Hemisphere at the latitude of Argentina, which was acceptable at the time, as Argentina was not planned to be an original member of the United Nations.^[10] The projection was later altered so that no country will be at prominence within the flag. The new logo was now designed so that the globe is bisected in the centre by the Prime Meridian and the International Date Line.
In 1946, a UNO committee got the task of making a definite design, which was presented December 2, 1946, and adopted by the plenary session of the UNO on December 7, 1946. The earlier version had the globe 90 degrees turned eastward compared with the present flag, which has the Prime Meridian and the International Date Line forming the vertical diameter. According to press statements, the change was made to move North America away from the centre of the emblem.

There is just one teeny problem with that. That map is replicated possibly upside down and/or backwards on the moon somehow, a moon that apparently people can see a star through the dark side while in crescent, apparently.

As a diehard lifelong scifi enthusiast, yes, I am utterly familiar with light bending around spherical objects, so I'm not going into a science debate here. Just pointing things out.

We keep hearing echos of "There are no coincidences" during the big Q intel drops over the last few years.

Let's get back to that architecure, which we've obviously never been able to truly replicate.

I used to ask as a kid why columns of ruined buildings were left standing. It makes no sense to leave them up. Unless you don't want anyone to know what they are made of on the inside, so you leave them up for historical value.

I used to ask as a kid why the streets were so crap in old westerns when obviously they knew how to make decent buildings. After all, there are streets set up all over the world, even in small villages. Why did TV keep showing us dirty muddy streets as a rule of thumb? Unless they were instilling in our minds that was a natural state of things for humans in order to cover for older pictures of big beautiful cities full of muddy streets, which aren't generally available to find.

Ok, that was where I left off. Time to finish this.

I think I need to get some focus back, plus I've had more time to think. First of all, I'm pretty sure our world wasn't exactly idyllic before the parasites and the big world cataclysm. Second of all, if Atlantis is truly synonymous with the bad guys, we need to define who exactly the bad guys were and probably still are. Third, we need to recognize that there could have been layers overlapping and nothing can be read in architecture and bits of historical evidence at face value, especially if anyone is purporting that history was rewritten and bits of it erased and whatnot.

So, again, basic question, did black hats or white hats build the original worldwide energy grid, and was there a deeper purpose than simply providing power? Because if the entire grid was destroyed, that means whoever destroyed it was both organized and had access, right. I can't help wondering if the destruction was in part due to both sides and possibly even a third party with very flexible relationships with both the other sides to the point of pulling off subterfuge.

These things are never easy to untangle, so I'm not taking any of the vids at face value. You can put all the pretty music you want in front of pretty buildings, but that doesn't mean 1- the people were good, 2- the intent was good, or 3- they were us in any form, even as ancestors.

And I'll tell you why.

THAT information, as compelling as it is, completely leaves out another huge bit of historical information coming to light that begs everything about the entire question of who did what and why. And that is our human trafficking issue, thoroughly documented as being supported and covered for by every government on our world going back throughout human history. The mix of good and bad guys is so messed up over so long a time, the cover stories and ridiculous legal structures and scam bankster fraudulent Feds, that it's incredible and very time consuming to sift it all down into a coherent history, much less an ongoing war being very strongly silenced by complicit medias.

So you tell me. Did the 'benevolent' human trafficking bloodline families pose their way into creating a power grid for everyone in order to keep us in bondage? Did a well organized slave uprising take down the worldwide grid system so that people could go free? And did that backfire terribly into another big world cataclysm cleansing the rebel populations down to more manageable proportions to start over with an all new grid system? Because the bad guys that we know of now, the elites of the world, have been lying to us all this time about science and how we are so lucky to have this life encumbering energy grid now that keeps us all monitored and debt enslaved to the point where they have the power of life and death over us if, like, the power stations all simultaneously and very needlessly go down in a big Texas ice storm, for example.

So I'm questioning everything. I have no problem believing our history is fake and that our world really had a free energy grid, because that makes scientific sense. What doesn't make sense is the very simple explanations I'm hearing as to what happened.

I think it all boils down to human slavery from the very start. Whoever the "parasites" were and probably still are, this is what the entire Q operation is all about, and this time it won't backfire. This time they get purged.

In my opinion, the whole fake moon thing and flat earth vs global earth is a big distraction from what is really going on. None of the side taking matters as long as people are still being farmed, tortured, and sold as products. Nothing else matters until we make that stop. Because until that stops, the rest is just a cover to keep our eyes and minds off it so we'll dismiss it and let it continue.

And shrugging that off in favor of arguing about the moon isn't any different from walking by a person being kicked and raped to death on the street and pretending like you didn't see it happening.

And that is why they say we live in a Matrix. We create this illusion together. What is real? If you choose not to see something, it isn't real to you, is it?

Do you want the reality of knowing what is the truth? Then we need to stop human slavery. Once the baddies are purged, we will get all the truth they hid from us.

And now to explain the screenshot at the very top of this post. I was in a multi-person convo on the phone about covid being a political excuse with the same results as communism when I was a kid while I was gaming on this laptop. Sometimes my game will freeze up and I have to refresh the page, but during that convo, the laptop froze and completely locked me out, something I've never seen it do before. I could move the mouse, but I couldn't get it to click anything. I killed and rebooted twice, same thing. By the second time I was able to right click and get menus, but the reboot wasn't coming up properly at all. I did a third reboot, finally got a power menu, and used the mouse to 'restart'. After my laptop finally booted up normally, the very first picture to come up was that screenshot at the top of this post, which was astounding since it has everything to do with this research that I stalled out on. What are the odds that my laptop would freeze up and lock me out during a live covid convo and then come up with that particular picture out of all the dozens of nature and city shots I've seen while I'm literally researching buildings like that?

Because that building is part of the ancient free energy grid.